Legal Opinion

People v. Odom

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 14, 1997No. 96SA438PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer discipline case. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be privately censured, ordered to make certain restitution, and be required to take and pass the professional responsibility examination. We issued an order to show cause why more severe discipline should not be imposed. The respondent did not reply to the.order to show cause. In his response, the assistant disciplinary counsel now takes the position that the respondent should be disbarred. We agree and order that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. ChappellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RishelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. MascarenasSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. People v. NitschkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API