Codman v. Roberds
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman March 4, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. In an action on notes for the purchase price of potash bought for use as a fertilizer, Roberds, the payee, obtained a verdict against Codman, the maker, for the full amount of the notes. The evidence being conflicting, the judgment will not be reversed on the general grounds of the motion for new trial.
2. By section 1796 of the Civil Code (1910) it is provided that “It shall be lawful for manufacturers, jobbers, dealers, and manipulators of commercial fertilizers and fertilizer material to sell or offer for sale in .the State of Georgia acid phosphate or other fertilizer materials in bulk…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petty v. Brunswick & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Butler v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Savannah Chemical Co. v. Beagg & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Davis v. GaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanford-Brown Co. v. Patent C. Company Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Ayers v. John B. Daniel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Kitchens v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Radlo of Georgia, Inc. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Atlanta Tallow Co. v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.