Legal Opinion

Sanford-Brown Co. v. Patent C. Company Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1945No. 15093PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) One of the grounds of the general demurrer asserted that the allegations of damages for alleged increase in the plaintiff’s pay roll, and for increase in the rate of insurance premiums, were too remote, speculative, and conjectural to be items of damage cognizable in law or equity. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer on this ground. “ Remote or consequential damages are not allowed whenever they can not be traced solely to the breach of the contract, or unless they are capable of exact computation, such as the profits which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad v. HaydenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Codman v. RoberdsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Brockman v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. TyreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Buffington v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Camilla Cotton Oil Company and George M. Perry, Sr. v. Spencer Kellogg and Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Brown v. Five Points Parking CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Crawford & Associates, Inc. v. Groves-Keen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Walton v. DatryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API