Legal Opinion

Ayers v. John B. Daniel Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1926No. 17033PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The rule against the recovery of vague, speculative, or uncertain damages relates more especially to the uncertainty as to cause, rather than uncertainty as to the measure orcextent of the damages. Mere difficulty in fixing their exact amount, where proximately flowing from the alleged injury, does not constitute a legal obstacle in the way of their allowance, when the amount .of the recovery comes within that authorized with reasonable certainty by the legal evidence submitted. 17 C. J. 756, 757. Accordingly, where, as in the instant case, the plaintiff proves that he gave a dealer an order…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Refrigerator & Butchers Supply Co. v. ParmaleeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. OverbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Allison v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Planters Cotton Oil Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Butler v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Camilla Cotton Oil Company and George M. Perry, Sr. v. Spencer Kellogg and Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Molly Pitcher Canning Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Booker v. J. T. Bickers Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Summerfield v. DeCinqueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Kitchens v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API