Legal Opinion

Keen v. Prisinzano

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1972No. Civ. 12816PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgments of nonsuit in favor of both defendant physicians (Prisinzano and Edgar) in a malpractice action in which the complaint charged each defendant with negligent diagnosis and care (first cause), negligent advice (third cause), and negligent nondisclosure (second and fourth causes).

Relatively slight argument is devoted by plaintiff to the second, third, and fourth causes of action. We have concluded from a review of the record that the judgments were so. plainly correct as to those three causes that no further discussion of them herein is warranted.

P…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Johnson v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  4. Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. James v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
  2. Kobos by and Through Kobos v. EvertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bromme v. PavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Atienza v. TaubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Alef v. Alta Bates HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API