Legal Opinion

James v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 16, 1980No. C-79-1833-WWSPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

WILLIAM W SCHWARZER, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injury brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq. The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The law of California, the place where the complained of acts occurred, controls. Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 9, 82 S.Ct. 585, 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962); United States v. English, 521 F.2d 63, 65 (9th Cir. 1975).

Plaintiff William James complains that defendant negligently failed to inform him of the discovery of a suspected tumor…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Keene v. WigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Snelson v. KammIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gooding v. University Hosp. Bldg., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API