Legal Opinion
Atienza v. Taub
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1987No. B023171PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order of dismissal of an action for professional negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought by Maria Atienza (appellant) against Morris Taub, M.D. (respondent) following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm.
The first amended complaint sets forth the following factual allegations which, for the purposes of review, we accept as true: respondent is a licensed physician with a medical practice. On October 20, 1983, appellant went to respondent for treatment of a “phlebitic [s/c] condition” allegedly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Waters v. BourhisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Roy v. HartogsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Yun Hee So v. Sook Ja ShinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Mock v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- McCracken v. Walls-KaufmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.