Legal Opinion

Barber v. National Bank of Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1991No. S-3736PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case concerns events surrounding the National Bank of Alaska’s (NBA) foreclosure of Michael Barber’s duplex property. Barber appeals the superior court’s grant of partial summary judgment and directed verdict. The superior court dismissed by summary judgment Barber’s claims under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1 and the Alaska Unfair Trade and Consumer Practices Act. 2 The superior court granted NBA’s motion for a directed verdict on Barber’s claims of general negligence, misrepresentation, breach of covenants of good faith and fair dealing, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Perry v. Stewart Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Alaska Housing Finance Corp. v. SalvucciAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lundquist v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API