Legal Opinion

Cober v. Connolly

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1942No. Sac. 5415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In an action to quiet title and to require a reconveyance of real property, judgment was rendered for the respondents when they proved that they had rendered services and delivered merchandise to one of the payees of a promissory note under an agreement that the value of the services and merchandise should be credited upon the note. The appellants, one of whom is also a payee of the note and the other the trustee named in the deed of trust securing it, contend that the makers of a promissory note providing for payment in cash may not extinguish the obligation by the performance of such an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailes v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Delano v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hoover v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wright v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Barnes v. OsgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Bloomfield v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. George L. Cayce and Ana Jane Cayce v. Carter Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Harry H. White Lumber Co. v. Crocker-Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Hurley v. Southern California Edison Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API