Legal Opinion

Wright v. Mix

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1888No. 9932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of' San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the- opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

—Suit to declare a trust as to one third of a judgment recovered by the defendant, Mix, against one Henry Miller. It appears that Miller employed Mix, who was a searcher of records, to prepare an abstract of title to the Las Animas rancho to be used in a partition suit. A few days after the agreement, the defendant, Mix, with the consent of Miller, associated with himself another searcher (one Howes), and agreed that he should have one third of what should be obtained for their services. When the abstract was prepared, a dispute arose as to what was to be paid for it, no sum having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank v. LaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  2. Moran v. AbbeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Bailes v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. James v. YaegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API