Legal Opinion
H. S. Mann Corp. v. Moody
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 1956No. Civ. 21570PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
This appeal presents the problem of priority between assignments of certain receivables, plaintiff having purchased same while they were in futuro and defendant after they were in esse. Judgment went for plaintiff in the sum of $3,501.77. It runs in favor of H. S. Mann Corporation, doing business as California Smelting and Refining Company, and against Advance Industrial Finance Company, a limited partnership, and H. R. Goedert, one of the general partners. Defendants appeal from the judgment.
On September 16, 1952, Bryce Moody was indebted to H. S. Mann in the sum of $8,595.70 for raw…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. KlauderSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Bridge v. KedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Meyer v. Board of Trustees of San Dieguito Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.