Legal Opinion
Milliken & Co. v. Bank of China
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 2010No. 09 Civ. 6123 (LMM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MeKENNA, District Judge.
Respondent Bank of China (“Bank”) objects, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, to a Memorandum and Order of Magistrate Judge Francis, dated August 11, 2010, which denied the Bank’s motion for a protective order, precluded the Bank from asserting any lien on an account with the Bank superior to that of petitioner, and required the Bank to produce certain documents and to respond to certain interrogatories. Familiarity with Judge Francis’ Memorandum and Order is assumed.
The initial objections (see Docket No. 23) have been modified (see Docket No. 27) so that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi AndrewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.