Legal Opinion
Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Qi Andrew
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 2011No. 10 Civ. 9471 (WHP)(HBP)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs move for an Order compelling non-parties Bank of China (“BOC”), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (“ICBC”) and China Merchants Bank (“CMB”) (collectively the “Banks”) to produce documents *145pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum that was served upon them in January 2011. The Banks oppose plaintiffs’ motion.
For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion to compel is denied without prejudice to renewal.
II. Facts
Plaintiffs Tiffany (NJ) LLC and Tiffany and Company are the well-known, high-end manufacturers of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hermes International v. Lederer De Paris Fifth Avenue, Inc. And Artbag Creations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Bank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Leibovitch v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.