Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1983No. 1323PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order entering summary judgment. The action is for damages arising from the purchase and repair of a truck. The lower court held that damages were precluded because the purchase order stated that the truck was being sold “as is—where is.” However, the lower court did not consider conduct by the seller subsequent to the purchase order, thereby leaving unresolved the issues of whether all warranties had been effectively disclaimed, and whether any obligation subsequent to the purchase order had arisen. We therefore reverse.

The pleadings and answers to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Amabile v. Auto Kleen Car WashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Jones & McKnight Corp. v. Birdsboro CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
  5. Tom Morello Construction Co. v. Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Overly v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Daughen v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. McCain v. PennbankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API