Legal Opinion

The Cherokee

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 13, 1923No. 1187PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

This cause was presented on an agreed statement of facts, as follows:

“It is hereby understood and agreed that the following facts shall be taken as proof upon the trial of this cause:
“That heretofore, to wit, on or about the 11th day of March, 1923, the vessel in controversy, the Cherokee, was found in Offat Bayou, in Galveston county, Tex., and within the Southern district of Texas, laden with 701 packages, each containing one-half case of liquor; that at the time that said vessel was found no one was present or actually in charge of same, but that later John L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. One Haynes AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  3. United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  4. United States v. One Ford AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  3. The ThomastonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  4. United States v. One Bay State RoadsterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1924
  5. The Rosalie M.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API