United States v. One Haynes Automobile
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Rhydon M. Call, Judge. Suit by the United States against one Haynes automobile, Model 45, Type T, engine No. 35909. Judgment for respondent, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge.
In this case a libel was brought to condemn the above-described automobile, under United States Revised Statutes, § 3450 (Comp. St. § 6352), on the ground that it was at the time of seizure being used in the removal, deposit, and concealment of distilled spirits, on which the taxes had not been paid, to a place other than one authorized by law, with intent to defraud the United States of the taxes thereon. The question presented is whether the libel can be sustained under Revised Statutes, § 3450; it being conceded that it *927does not allege facts sufficient to sustain it…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Fontenot v. AccardoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. One Packard Motor TruckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- States v. ManganoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.