Legal Opinion
United States v. One Buick Automobile
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 22, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLEDSOE, District Judge.
These three cases, having to do with the asserted right of forfeiture of an automobile used in transporting liquor in violation of law, will be considered together.
*585In the first case the automobile was being operated either by or for one McGregor, who had agreed to obtain and deliver a comparatively small quantity of liquor to a person who afterwards turned out to be a federal prohibition agent. There is some conflict in the evidence as to whether McGregor, admittedly not the owner of the machine, was driving it at the time of the transportation of the liquor. Whether…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- United States v. One Kissel Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923
- United States v. One Studebaker AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1924
- United States v. One 1920 Premier AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Charles Zimmerman Sons Co. v. FergusonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
- United States v. 3,500 Cases, More or Less, of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1926
- United States v. One Bay State RoadsterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1924
- United States v. One Lincoln Touring CarDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.