Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. One Ford Automobile

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 13, 1923No. 383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

This is a libel of forfeiture brought by the United States, seeking to condemn under sections 3061 and 3062, Revised Statutes (Comp. St. §§ 5763, 5764), long known as the “Cus*208toms Laws,” a Ford automobile. The libel prays in the alternative for forfeiture under section 26, title 2, National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305).

The owner of the vehicle was convicted in this court under section 5841hl3, U. S. Comp. Stat. 1923, a part of the Tariff Act of 1922, and he makes no appearance.

An intervention has been filed on behalf of the International Investment Company and J.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
  2. United States v. One Reo Speed WagonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
  3. The CherokeeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1923
  4. The ErmisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1929
  5. United States v. One Bay State RoadsterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API