Legal Opinion

Finsilver v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1925No. 2411PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaND, Judge

Appellants have appealed to this court from a decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers, denying their petition for remission of additional duties. The petition is filed under section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922, pertinent portions of such section relating to additional duties being as follows:

Additional duties. — If the final appraised value of any article of imported merchandise which is subject to an ad valorem rate of duty or to a duty based upon or regulated in any manner by the value thereof, shall exceed the entered value, there shall be levied, collected; and paid,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FishSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. American Metal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Fish v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Glendenning, McLeish & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Lowe Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Schrikker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API