Legal Opinion

Fish v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 28, 1924No. 2266PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers denying two petitions filed under section 489 of the tariff act of 1922 with relation to additional duties.

The petitions prayed for orders or findings of the board that the importer entered the merchandise at a less value than the final appraised value thereof without intent to defraud the revenues of the United States, or to conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraisers as to the value of the merchandise.

Section 489 of the tariff act of 1922 reads as follows:

Sec. 489. Additional duties. * * * Such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Creamer v. BivertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. United States v. Lee HuenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1902
  3. United States v. RiebeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  4. In re Van BlankensteynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  5. McQuisten v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Finsilver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Glendenning, McLeish & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. American Metal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API