Legal Opinion

Wolf v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 13, 1926No. 2336PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, Presiding Judge

S. H. Kress & Co., a syndicate conducting a chain of retail five, ten, and twenty-five cent stores, placed an order with C. A. Seydel & Sohne, of Untersachsenberg, Saxony, on October 16, 1922, for certain harmonicas. This order was placed through Louis Wolf & Co., the appellants, as agents. Prior to the time of purchase, S. H. Kress & Co. had sent a representative to Europe with instructions “to get something unusual,” “to get values.” This repi’esentative purchased the goods and ordered them shipped to Louis Wolf & Co., as commissionaires. The goods were shipped from Untersachsenberg October…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. FishSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Finsilver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Linen Thread Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Glendenning, McLeish & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Fish v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Zinberg v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Selig v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Shainin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API