Legal Opinion

Schrikker v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2620PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellant petitioned the Board of General Appraisers, under section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922, for remission of additional duties levied by the collector at the port of New York on account of the undervaluation by appellant of his imported merchandise, cabbage.

The pertinent part of section 489 reads as follows:

Such additional duties shall not be construed to be penal and shall not be remitted nor payment thereof in any way avoided, except in the case of a manifest clerical error, upon the order of the Secretary of the Treasury, or in any case upon the finding of the Board of General…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barlow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Finsilver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Union Food Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. (PR) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Cintes v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Gresham v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API