Legal Opinion
Glendenning, McLeish & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 18, 1926No. 2630PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
A petition for remission of additional duties was filed by appellant, under section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The goods, six cases of miscellaneous linens, were purchased by the importer in Belfast, Ireland, December 3, 1923. They were shipped March 22, and entered at New York April 3, 1924. On entry, the importer made certain additions to the various items on the invoice, to make market value. Thereafter, the appraiser made further additions to seven items in the invoice. The appellant seeks a remission of the additional duties imposed, following this advance by the appraiser.
Mr.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finsilver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Linen Thread Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Klein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. American Metal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Fish v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Vietor v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. North American Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Massce & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.