Legal Opinion

Urban Renewal Agency of Austin v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1974No. 12118PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Austin sought to condemn a tract of land owned by Georgetown Savings and Loan Association subject to a contract of sale with Pat Cain and Wayne D. Rodgers. The trial court rendered judgment vesting title to the property in the Urban Renewal Agency (hereinafter referred to as the Agency), and awarded the appellees $31,500 based on the jury’s answer to special issues. The appellant Agency has duly perfected its appeal to this Court. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.

I

Appellant is before us on twenty-six…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Houston v. Johnny Frank's Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Melton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Bruner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. City of Garland v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Austin v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. KraftTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Collin County v. Hixon Family Partnership, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  5. McKinney Independent School District v. Carlisle Grace, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API