Legal Opinion

La Fetra v. Richardson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1919No. Civ. No. 3109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff claims that the defendants have greatly injured his orange orchard by wrongfully diverting thereon large quantities of storm water. He seeks an injunction, and prays for damages. Defendants had judgment and plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone.

Plaintiff is the owner of an orange orchard on the southerly slope of the Sierra Madre Mountains. Just north of the land of plaintiff, and- separated therefrom by Ledora Avenue, are the lands of defendants. Located in these mountains is a deep ravine, known as Shorey-Canyon, which, with its many branches, constitutes the natural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ogburn v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Heier v. KrullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. YuleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API