Miller v. Yule
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This appeal is from the judgment made and entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants W. A. C. Yule and Josephine K. Yule. The defendant M. M. Corry did not appeal. The judgment-roll only is before the court.
On February 28, 1921, respondents entered into a contract with appellants for the purchase and sale of lots 3 and 10 in block 121 of Middletown, situated at No. 3141 India Street, in San Diego, the purchase price being $2,950. The respondents, who were the purchasers under the contract, made an initial payment when they executed the contract of $500 in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Yule v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sprouse v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals · 1956