Slocum v. City of Medford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
By this petition brought under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40, § 53, the petitioners as taxable inhabitants of Medford seek to restrain the city and its mayor and board of health from expending money under an alleged five year contract with Riverside Disposal Company for the collection and removal of garbage.
From the master’s report it appears that after the bringing of this proceeding the only contract mentioned in the petition was cancelled by both parties before it went into operation, and that another or substitute contract between the city and one Sacco, doing business as the Riverside *253Transporta…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edge Moor Bridge Works v. County of BristolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Dealtry v. Selectmen of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- United States Drainage & Irrigation Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- MacDonald v. Board of Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Burke v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Annese Electrical Services, Inc. v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Datatrol Inc. v. State Purchasing AgentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Scannell v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.