Legal Opinion
Lummus Construction v. Vancourt
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 15, 1992No. 78428PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ADAMS, Presiding Judge:
Lummus Construction employed Morris Vancourt from July 5, 1989 until June 21, 1990. Vancourt, a pipe fitter for over twenty years, filed a claim for hearing losses in both ears, allegedly from exposure to loud noises during his employment with Lummus. The trial court found Vancourt had an 11.2 per cent binaural hearing loss and ordered Lummus to pay permanent partial disability benefits.
Lummus Construction denies Vancourt sustained all his hearing loss while in Lum-mus’s employ, citing uncontradicted evidence Vancourt had a hearing problem pri- or to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Wise-Buchanan Coal Co. v. RiscoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Parks v. Flint Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ellis & Lewis, Inc. v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. SerraColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Celestica Inc. v. HinesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Kerr Glass Co. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Parks v. Kerr GlassCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Keco, Inc. v. HaywardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.