Legal Opinion
Keco, Inc. v. Hayward
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 2005No. 100,925PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioners Keco, Inc. (Employer) and Medmarc Insurance Company (Medmarc, or collectively, Petitioners) seek review' of orders of the trial court holding Medmarc solely responsible for cumulative trauma injuries to the left hand/thumb of Respondent Carroll Hayward (Claimant) and dismissing Respondent Villanova Insurance Company (Villano-va), predecessor in interest to the OMahoma Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (OPCIGA). In this proceeding, Petitioners assert the trial court erred as a matter of both fact and law in dismissing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Sudbury v. DeterdingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- CNA Insurance Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Southern Material Handling Co. v. FallingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.