Legal Opinion

Parks v. Kerr Glass

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1994No. 82191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Judge:

Petitioner Roger Parks (Claimant), and Cross-Petitioners/Respondents Kerr Glass and CNA Insurance Company (collectively Kerr), seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Court order finding Claimant had sustained compensable injuries and apportioning compensation between Kerr and Co-Respondents/Cross-Respondents, Ball Incon Glass and Travelers Insurance Company (collectively Ball).

Claimant was employed by Kerr from 1968 until February 28, 1992. On the latter date, Ball took over operation of the Kerr plant, however Claimant’s work conditions as a forklift operator remained…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Pierson v. CanuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Parks v. Flint Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rhea v. Southwest CupidCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Ball-Incon Glass v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. RichardsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Kerr Glass v. HeplerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Parks v. Kerr GlassCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API