Kerr Glass Co. v. Wilson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Judge:
Petitioners Kerr Glass and CNA Insurance Company (collectively Kerr), seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Court order finding Respondent David Wilson (Claimant) had sustained compensable injuries and appor*416tioning compensation between Kerr and Respondents, Ball Incon Glass and Travelers Insurance Company (collectively Ball).
Claimant was employed by Kerr for approximately nine and one half years until February 28, 1992. On that date, Ball took over operation of the Kerr plant, however Claimant’s work conditions remained the same. Claimant filed his claim on September 17,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Lake v. LietchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Marquette v. MarquetteCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Morton v. Adair County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Celestica Inc. v. HinesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Ball-Incon Glass v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Keco, Inc. v. HaywardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.