Nash v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
Louise Nash was a gratuitous passenger or guest in the auto-mobile driven by Sarah Adams. She was not the owner of the car and had no control of it; neither is there evidence that the deceased was engaged in a joint enterprise with the driver or other occupants of the car. Consequently, any negligence on the part of the driver would not be imputed to the deceased. In the light of the facts and circumstances disclosed by the present record, the rule of law, therefore, applicable to the'facts was stated in Earwood v. R. R., 192 N. C., 27, as follows: “Therefore, negligence on the part of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Butner v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Odom v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Thurston v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harper v. . Harper and Wickham v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Caldwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keller v. . R.R. and Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Etheridge v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.