Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caldwell v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1DissentBarnhill, J.

STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., concur in dissent. This was an action to recover damages for injury to person and property alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants, growing out of a collision between plaintiff's automobile and one of defendant railway company's trains, then being operated by the individual defendants as engineer and fireman respectively. The injury occurred on the night of 7 December, 1937, at a grade crossing on North Lee Street, in the city of Salisbury, North Carolina.

Plaintiff alleged failure of the defendants to give timely warning of the approach…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Central Passenger Railway Co. v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Turner v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API