Legal Opinion
Isaacs v. Caterpillar, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided May 23, 1991No. 88-1137PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, said Motion is denied, but the Court certifies this issue for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
I.FINDINGS OF FACT
A. Proceedings to Date in the Litigation
1. This lawsuit is brought by certain former management employees of Defendant Caterpillar, Inc. Plaintiffs are persons who retired or were separated from Caterpillar at various times between July 1985 and May 1987. The Plaintiffs allege that Caterpillar engaged in a pattern or practice of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jakimas v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Wamsley v. Champlin Refining and Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Thomas Long v. Sears Roebuck & Company Sears Merchandise Group. Thomas G. LongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Gerald Oberg v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Forbus v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.