Legal Opinion
Gerald Oberg v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 10, 1994No. 92-3472, 92-3893PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
In this case, Gerald Oberg, Nicholas Tautz and Stephen Adams (“Plaintiffs”) were all employees of Allied Van Lines, Inc. (“Allied”). As part of a reduction in force, Allied fired the Plaintiffs along with approximately 60 other employees. Contesting their termination, Plaintiffs filed suit against Allied and its parent company NFC Consortium (“Defendants”) under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). 29 U.S.C. § 626 (1967). The Defendants moved to dismiss the suit under Rule 12(b)(6), or alternatively for summary judgment under Rule 56, proffering special…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lopez House v. Scott BelfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In the Matter of Robert P. Jordan, Debtor. Robert P. Jordan and Wesley Ann Jordan v. Southeast National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ikerd v. LapworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Albert L. Lawrence v. National Westminster Bank New Jersey, Albert LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Joseph Rodriguez v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Department of Corrections, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Burton Blistein v. St. John's CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Beatrice Fleming v. United States Postal Service Amf O'Hare and Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Wamsley v. Champlin Refining and Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.