Sacramento-Yolo Port District v. Rodda
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
By this proceeding in mandamus, the petitioners, sometimes referred to hereinafter as the district, seek an *838order of this court compelling respondent A. S. Eodda, auditor of said district, to certify the correctness of a warrant duly approved by petitioners and drawn in favor of the Treasurer of the United States for the Secretary of the Army in the sum of $1,000. The warrant represents a portion of a total of $500,000 which the petitioners propose to advance to the Secretary of the Army in accordance with a resolution duly adopted by the petitioners’ board of directors. According to said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- County of Los Angeles v. La FuenteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. All Parties and PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dolan v. Borough of TenaflySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Dolan v. Borough of TenaflySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Tos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021