Legal Opinion

Sacramento-Yolo Port District v. Rodda

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1949No. Civ. No. 7627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

By this proceeding in mandamus, the petitioners, sometimes referred to hereinafter as the district, seek an *838order of this court compelling respondent A. S. Eodda, auditor of said district, to certify the correctness of a warrant duly approved by petitioners and drawn in favor of the Treasurer of the United States for the Secretary of the Army in the sum of $1,000. The warrant represents a portion of a total of $500,000 which the petitioners propose to advance to the Secretary of the Army in accordance with a resolution duly adopted by the petitioners’ board of directors. According to said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. County of Los Angeles v. La FuenteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. All Parties and PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dolan v. Borough of TenaflySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Dolan v. Borough of TenaflySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Tos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API