Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Borough of Tenafly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 1977Published

1Opinion of the Court

75 N.J. 163 (1977)

380 A.2d 1119

MILES F. DOLAN, WILLIAM T. DIEFFENBACH, PHILIP CODNER, PAUL LOSICK, FRANK QUITADAMO, WARREN TISCH AND ANNE M. PEMBROKE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

BOROUGH OF TENAFLY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 28, 1976.

Decided November 30, 1977.

Mr. Walter T. Wittman argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Wittman, Anzalone, Bernstein and Dunn, attorneys; Mr. Wittman and Mr. Frederick L. Bernstein, of counsel; Mr. Thomas W. Dunn on the brief).

Mr. Philip R. Carlin and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. 405 Monroe Co. v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Albigese v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API