Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Eagle Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 18, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The policy of insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff required the defendant to defend all claims and suits for bodily injury against the plaintiff caused by her automobile. Among the conditions precedent to the right of recovery was this: “Upon the occurrence of any accident.covered by this policy, the insured shall give immediate written notice thereof to the company at its head office or to the agent who has countersigned this policy, and forward to the company or agent forthwith after receipt thereof every process, pleading and paper of any kind relating to any and all claims, suits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bouton v. American Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Norwich & New York Transportation Co. v. Western Massachusetts InsuranceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1868
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. People's Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Midland Glass & Paint Co. v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Porto v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Baker v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Capece v. Allstate Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.