Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1955No. 673PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendants’ brief contains no argument and cites no authority relating to an error of law. It relates solely to their contention that the division made by the commissioners was unequal, adverse to them.

Whether the division was unequal or fair and equitable, was a question of fact determinable by Judge Gwyn. McMillan v. McMillan, 123 N.C. 577, 31 S.E. 729; Fisher v. Toxaway Co., 171 N.C. 547, 88 S.E. 887.

There are no exceptions to the findings of fact. Defendants’ sole exceptive assignment of error is to the signing of the judgment. Thus, the only question presented is whether the facts found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scarboro v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. McMillan v. . McMillanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Fisher v. . Toxaway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Fisher v. Toxaway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Travis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Bishop v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. West v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Couch v. CouchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API