Legal Opinion

Couch v. Couch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 25, 1973No. 7315SC155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Although appellants in their brief raise nine questions, they properly conceded in oral argument that if the findings of the court are supported by evidence the judgment must be affirmed.

*110“Where an ^actual partition of lands has been ordered, whether the división made by the commissioners was fair and equitable or unequal in value is a question of fact to be determined by the Judge of the Superior Court upon an appeal from a judgment of the clerk affirming the report of the commissioners. Byrd v. Thompson, 243 N.C. 271, 90 S.E. 2d 394. The findings of the judge are conclusive and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Byrd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. McMillan v. . McMillanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. West v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Purdy v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem v. WeathermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API