Couch v. Couch
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Although appellants in their brief raise nine questions, they properly conceded in oral argument that if the findings of the court are supported by evidence the judgment must be affirmed.
*110“Where an ^actual partition of lands has been ordered, whether the división made by the commissioners was fair and equitable or unequal in value is a question of fact to be determined by the Judge of the Superior Court upon an appeal from a judgment of the clerk affirming the report of the commissioners. Byrd v. Thompson, 243 N.C. 271, 90 S.E. 2d 394. The findings of the judge are conclusive and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Byrd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- McMillan v. . McMillanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- West v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Purdy v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem v. WeathermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974