Allen v. Allen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The question for decision is whether the court, after setting aside the report of the commissioners, had authority, based on its own findings as to what would constitute an equitable division, to adjudge a partition of the land different from that made by the commissioners.
Since 1868, the partition of land between tenants in common has been regulated by statute. Haddock v. Stocks, 167 N.C. 70, 74, 83 S.E. 9; Bank v. Leverette, 187 N.C. 743, 746, 123 S.E. 68. The statutory procedure is set forth in G.S. Chapter 46, Article 1.
G.S. 46-10 provides, in part, that the commissioners appointed under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Taylor v. . CarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Bank v. . LeveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Macon v. EdingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Donnell-Smith v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Jenkins v. FoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Etheridge v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983