Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1914No. 5671PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Cleveland County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by E. E. Anderson and others against J. F. Taylor. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On October 8, 1913, defendants in error brought suit in the district court of Cleveland- county against J. E. Taylor, plaintiff in error, the object of which is to test the constitutionality, of an Act approved March 7,. 1,913- (Senate .Bill No. 7?, c. 24, Sess. Laws 1913, p. 41). The petition substantially states that one of the plaintiffs, Wm. Morgan, Jr., is a local cotton dealer at Norman and, as such, had, together with other cotton owned by him, twenty bales of cotton stored in the cotton yard operated by defendant at that place; that his coplaintiff, Anderson, Clayton & Co., of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ByrdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. RainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Wright v. SalzbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Buford v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Orwig v. EmerickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API