Legal Opinion
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Raines
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 13, 1930No. 7443PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
It is provided in section 1 of tlie act of 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 172) that commercial fertilizers as therein described, which are sold or offered for sale in this State shall “have plainly marked or branded, by attaching a tag upon each sack or package thereof the sources and ingredients from which the available phosphoric acid, potash, and nitrogen respectively is generated and obtained.” In section 2 of the act it is provided that if any such fertilizers or material shall prove deficient in any of its ingredients as “guaranteed or branded by attaching a tag or tags upon the sacks or packages…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Southern Mutual Insurance v. TurnleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Oxford v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Sale v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Fasching v. KallingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.