Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 24, 1890No. 762PublishedCited by 310 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MINNESOTA. This was. a writ of. error to review a 'judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota, awarding a writ of mandamus against the Chicago, Milwaukee ;& St. Paul Railway Company. ■The case arose on proceedings taken by the, Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota, under an act of the legislature of that State, approved March 7, 1887', General Laws of 1887, c. 10, entitled “ An act to regulate…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MINNESOTA. This was. a writ of. error to review a 'judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota, awarding a writ of mandamus against the Chicago, Milwaukee ;& St. Paul Railway Company. ■The case arose on proceedings taken by the, Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota, under an act of the legislature of that State, approved March 7, 1887', General Laws of 1887, c. 10, entitled “ An act to regulate common carriers, and creating the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota, and defining the duties of…

1Opinion of the Court

■jMjr. Justice Blatchfoed,

after 'stating the cáse as above1 reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

The .opinion of the Supreme Court pf, Minnesota is reported in 38 Minnesota, 281. In it the court in the first place , construed the statute on . the question as'to whether the court itself-had jurisdiction to entertain tpe proceeding, and held, that it had. Of course, w¿ óannot revie# this decision.

It next proceeded to consider the question as to the nature and extent of the powers granted to the . commission by the statute in the matter of fixing, the rates of charges. On-that subject it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by310 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API