Legal Opinion

Neve v. Insalaco's

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2001No. 1106 EDA 2000PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Violet A. Neve, appeals from an order denying her motion to remove the compulsory nonsuit entered by the trial court, which concluded that Appellant could not invoke res ipsa loquitor to establish negligence. Because the court evaluated the evidence under a standard that was inappropriately critical in the compulsory nonsuit context, we conclude that the court erred. Therefore, we reverse and remove the nonsuit.

¶ 2 At trial, the testimony of Appellant and her friend, Jan Black, revealed the following facts. On April 3, 1996, Appellant and Ms. Black went shopping…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Moultrey v. Great a & P Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Zito v. Merit Outlet StoresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Winkler v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Campisi v. Acme Markets Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Collins, D. v. Philadelphia Suburban DevelopmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Craig v. Franklin Mills Associates, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. D. Moon v. Dauphin CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Cochegrus v. Herriman CityUtah Supreme Court · 2020

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API