Legal Opinion

Winkler v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1976No. Appeal, 795PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

Mrs. Winkler, plaintiff below, sustained personal injuries as a result of a fall out a screen door on appellant’s premises. Appellant Seven Springs Farm, Inc., argues to this Court that its motion non obstante veredicto should have been granted because the plaintiff failed to show that any negligence on the part of appellant caused her fall. We agree that appellant should not be held liable for Mrs. Winkler’s injuries.

In considering a motion for judgment n.o.v., the evidence, together with all reasonable inferences capable of being drawn therefrom, must be viewed in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. McCutcheonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Moultrey v. Great a & P Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Neve v. Insalaco'sSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Glanski v. ErvineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API