Legal Opinion

Cochegrus v. Herriman City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2020No. Case No. 20161073PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter

2020 UT 14

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH CANDICE COCHEGRUS, Appellant, v. HERRIMAN CITY, ROSECREST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., and FUTURE COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC. DBA FCS COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, Appellees. No. 20161073 Heard February 14, 2018 Filed March 26, 2020 On Direct Appeal Third District, Salt Lake The Honorable Andrew H. Stone Case No. 140900711 Attorneys: Kenneth Parkinson, Peter Lattin, Provo, for appellant David L. Church, Salt Lake City, for appellee Herriman City Cory D.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Neve v. Insalaco'sSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Salo v. TylerUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Gallegos Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Midvale CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Trapnell v. Legacy ResortsUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Archuleta v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Estate of Huitron v. KayeUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Arlington Management v. Urology ClinicCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  5. Phillips v. SkabelundCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API