Moultrey v. Great a & P Tea Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
This is a “slip and fall” case in which the question presented is, whether in order to make out a prima facie case in a negligence action predicated upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 348 (1965), appellant-invitee must prove that appellee-proprietor had either actual or constructive notice of the offending transitory condition which allegedly caused appellant’s harm. The lower court, relying primarily upon Martino v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 419 Pa. 229, 213 A.2d 608 (1965) [hereinafter Martino] held that appellant-invitee, Ms. Moultrey, had such a burden and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- United States v. Philip HollingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Moran v. Valley Forge Drive-In Theater, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Estate of Swift Ex Rel. Swift v. Northeastern Hospital of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Neve v. Insalaco'sSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Myers v. Penn Traffic Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Zito v. Merit Outlet StoresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.