Legal Opinion

Moultrey v. Great a & P Tea Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1980No. 150PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

This is a “slip and fall” case in which the question presented is, whether in order to make out a prima facie case in a negligence action predicated upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 348 (1965), appellant-invitee must prove that appellee-proprietor had either actual or constructive notice of the offending transitory condition which allegedly caused appellant’s harm. The lower court, relying primarily upon Martino v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 419 Pa. 229, 213 A.2d 608 (1965) [hereinafter Martino] held that appellant-invitee, Ms. Moultrey, had such a burden and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. United States v. Philip HollingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Moran v. Valley Forge Drive-In Theater, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Estate of Swift Ex Rel. Swift v. Northeastern Hospital of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Neve v. Insalaco'sSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Myers v. Penn Traffic Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Zito v. Merit Outlet StoresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API