Legal Opinion
Yu v. Signet Bank/Virginia
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 2002No. A094519, A095102PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAY, P. J.
In Yu v. Signet Bank/Virginia (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 1377 [82 Cal.Rptr.2d 304] (Yu I), we reversed a summary judgment entered for defendants Signet Bank/Virginia and Capital One Bank (collectively Banks) on causes of action in the second amended complaint of plaintiffs William and Darlene Yu for abuse of process, and unlawful and unfair business practice (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200). In the present appeal by the Yus (A095102), we reverse the judgment entered for Banks on these causes of action after their demurrer to the third amended complaint was sustained without leave to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Grewal v. JammuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.