Legal Opinion

Dent v. Simmons

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 3, 1985No. 375, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

Today we reaffirm the principle that “[fjree access to the courts is an important and valuable aspect of an effective system of jurisprudence, and a party possessing a colorable claim must be allowed to assert it without fear of suffering a penalty more severe than that typically imposed on defeated parties.” Young v. Redman, 55 Cal.App.3d 827, 838, 128 Cal.Rptr. 86 (1976) (emphasis added). This is an appeal by Edward A. Dent, appellant, from an award of attorney’s fees against him in favor of Luiz R.S. Simmons, Esquire, the appellee. The judgment of the Circuit Court for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Empire Realty Co. v. FleisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Lang v. CattertonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. TIE COMMUNICATIONS v. Toyota MotorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Holzman v. Fiola Blum, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Newman v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Black v. Fox Hills North Community Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API